how it ends

POSITIVES 
- Forest Whitaker gets to play a grouchy man who can be a badass when needed. 
- This road trip story through an America experiencing societal collapse after a cataclysmic event is a solid premise. 
- The oil and water chemistry between Whitaker and James can be fun to watch. 
- There's a scene involving Whitaker trying to teach Theo James how to use a gun during an action scene that I found amusing, because I admittedly hardly see that addressed much in these kinds of films. 
- They surprisingly say F**K a lot of times in this movie, that you can make a drinking game out of it. 

NEGATIVES 
- The oil and water chemistry between Whitaker and James can be annoying to watch. 
- As a movie idea, we've seen this multiple times over, and just makes the whole thing feel overly derivative. 
- The plot and character progression with Whitaker and James are so very cliche. 
- Plot conveniences and lame plot developments are definitely here. 
- Action or Thriller sequences aren't that exciting either. 
- Bland and mediocre is the biggest problem with this film. 
- Dull and boring is the other issue people might have with it. 

loveditenjoyeditlikedititsokay  IT'S MEH  itsterrible 

You Can Watch It Now On NETFLIX (or don't)  

sorry to bother you

wooh! "Sorry To Bother You" has the makings of an instant cult classic. Writer-Director Boots Riley, gives us his first major motion picture, and it is a visionary treat! It has the sensibilities of an avant garde filmmaker, like what you tend to see from indie movies. It has imaginative visuals that will keep your eyes on the screen, wondering what you will see next. It moves at a kinetic pace, filled with crazy subtle touches of world building, background gags, to social-political commentary. You're going to want to keep close attention to what you see in this satirical film. 

The promotional trailer thankfully doesn't reveal all the juicy tidbits about this movie. There's a lot to unpack about what happens in the story, about what it's trying to say, about the metaphors, about the allegories, about the characters, etc... However, to say what I really think about what this movie's story is, very much means I'll have to get into spoilers territory. Which I'm not going to do in this review (the "Spoilers Pleeze" podcast perhaps?). All I can say is that the basic premise of this story takes you on a journey with generally familiar tropes, then tosses you into a variety of scenarios that are a little bit different than what you might expect. Maybe it's exactly what you expect, but perhaps not done in this style. 

Lakeith Stanfield is put to great use in this movie as Cassius Green, and proves he deserves more leading man roles. He is the character surrogate for us, and the decisions "Cash" makes in the story are going to be ones that you'll have to think hard on whether you would do exactly what he did. He goes through a lot in this, and if the story successfully puts it's magic on you, then you will definitely absolutely be invested with what happens to him, all the way until the final credits. The supporting cast are also great in this, from Tessa Thompson, Armie Hammer, Steven Yuen, Jermaine Fowler, and several more, but this is far and away Lakeith Stanfield's movie, and you will be okay with that. 

So the visuals are fantastic, the story is captivating, the characters are quite the characters, the plot is way out there, the social-political commentary is thought provoking, and the sense of humor plus self awareness are all just spot on! One can easily argue that "Sorry To Bother You" is not for everybody's taste, as it puts a lot of faith in the audience's ability to accept what they are watching here. Thankfully, I did, and had a blast! 

LOVED IT  enjoyeditlikedititsokayitsmehitsterrible

the first purge

I believe I have said before that I'm not a fan of this film series that started with 2013's "The Purge." As a horror fan I have to say that while the premise fits right in with horror films, it never really goes far enough with the genre for my taste. It's essentially just insane sociopaths stealing or killing, with only mild hints at other criminal activities. Pretty tame for what should be a balls to the wall gonzo premise. As expected "The First Purge" falls into that description as well. Action thriller second, disturbing horror third. Wait, what happened to "first?" 

Along with the action thriller and disturbing horror aspects that this franchise revolves around, the other element is the social political commentary of the premise. Unlike the previous films that only superficially plays around with the thematic commentary, this installment surprisingly does a better job at it. So yeah, social political commentary first. There's actually some world building here and scenes specifically dedicated to the reasoning behind The Purge. It's still not completely perfect, but I really appreciated the time they spent on the subject matter. 

Fans of the franchise might actually be disappointed with this installment, because it takes a while before the Purge starts in this story. If you're here just for the crazy killing, then this may not be for you. There are tons of death in this story of course, but more in the action film variety, than the horror kind. Speaking of horror, I did like the little gimmick they had involving glow in the dark contact lenses, that successfully looks creepy in the scenes they were used for. 

At this point, I'm ready to go so far and say that "The First Purge" not only acts as a nice prequel to the series, but it just may be the best installment to the franchise. Hold your horses though, because that isn't saying much. The characters are still made up of cliches and plot tropes, stupid things still happen for the sake of convenience, plus the final conclusion to the story is just so very unsatisfying. But hey, at least they showed signs of improvement here. 

loveditenjoyeditlikedit  IT'S OKAY  itsmehitsterrible

ant-man and the wasp

Remember how in 2015's "Ant-Man," the movie may not have been the epic-ness of other Marvel Studios movies, but it was a crowd-pleaser anyway? Same goes for "Ant-Man and the Wasp." Remember how part of that movie's entertainment value is that Paul Rudd and Michael Pena were funny guys? They are going to make you laugh a lot in this installment again. Remember how the power of shrinking was cool, and added some nice inventiveness to the action sequences? It's still cool on this one and still showcase some awesome action sequences, plus it's got more powers to show off here too! Remember how we were promised that Evangeline Lilly was going to finally be even more of a badass and contribute more to the action scenes? They mostly lived up to that promise, but with some caveats... 

Alright, let me tackle that last part first. Evangeline Lilly as the Wasp, is indeed a badass, and a lot of the best action sequences in this sequel involves her. As a strong female character, the Wasp has got the action parts no problem, but somehow the five people credited in writing this movie couldn't completely hit the landing with Hope Van Dyne herself. I don't really want to go into spoilers of course, but let's just say that besides the obvious, certain familiar plot tropes further emphasizes why Ant-Man gets first billing in the title. Does what I'm hinting at hurt the movie? Not too much, but they still kept all that there for me to criticize either way. 

Before you get the wrong idea, I did in fact have a lot of fun watching this movie. Right from the beginning and all the way until the end, I was having a blast. The plot moves at a quick pace, and just keeps going and going. There's a lot of cat and mouse scenarios here, which leads to some nice races against the clock, as well as some fantastic chase sequences. The story may get convoluted in juggling the different characters and the multiple sub-plots, but it all flows pretty well throughout the whole thing. Kudos to Peyton Reed's fine direction for this film. At a certain point though, despite the actual premise of the movie, I start asking "what's the point of all this, besides moving a story along?" Thank Goodness it has many fun set-pieces to distract me from asking that question too much. 

This movie really does feel like it has the typical comic book tale that doesn't seem like it's trying to reach lofty goals in story telling. It tells the story well from beginning until end, but the story itself isn't telling you anything else beyond plot details or expositions. That's fine though. It's entertaining. It's enjoyable. It's a lot of fun. It's a great excuse to put together a great cast that involves Paul Rudd, Evangeline Lilly, Michael Douglass, Michael Pena, Abby Ryder Fortson, Randall Park, Hannah John-Kamen, Laurence Fishburne, Walton Goggins, Michelle Pfeiffer, and more. All good to see on screen, and they all interact well together. 

In terms of ambition, "Ant-Man and the Wasp" doesn't seem to care that it's just trying to entertain us comic book loving movie audience, with an enjoyable story involving outlaw heroes trying to do what's right, despite the odds. It does succeed splendidly in that regards, so that in itself deserves your attention. 

lovedit  ENJOYED IT  likedititsokayitsmehitsterrible 

set it up

After watching different film genres from super hero action, historical dramas, to jump-scare-athon horror, sometimes you just want to watch a reliably entertaining romantic-comedy. You know, the genre that hardly gets any fanfare or excitement anymore whenever they are released in theaters? An evergreen genre that's endured throughout the decades, and have produced many well loved and well remembered classics? A so-called "underappreciated" movie genre? Enter, "Set it up." So how is this straight to Netflix rom-com? Surprisingly good. 

Did I say "surprisingly good?" Why is that a questionable answer? Is it because if you watch the promotional trailer for this, you feel like you've already seen the whole movie? Is it because just from a superficial level, it looks like a disposable movie that will be immediately forgotten? Is it because you've seen this kind of movie before and everything about it is just so predictable? Is it because all the plot turns and reveals and twists are oh so derivative? Yeah, that's all generally true. Well then, despite all that, I actually found myself really enjoying this movie anyway. So yeah, the movie was "surprisingly good." 

The movie has a lot of things going for it to further justify why you need to give this a chance. It doesn't need to try hard to be funny. It has very quotable lines that you're going to want to use in real life. It has a relatively straight forward story that's still going to make you want to keep watching until the end. It plays off as a tribute to all the people out there who have ever been an assistant that works way too hard for a horrible boss. It has nice themes and lessons to be learned. It has memorable scenes that are enjoyably executed. It has a fantastic cast. 

Zoey Deutch and Glen Powell are incredible in this! Zoey is completely adorable in her role as Harper, and Glen is just way too good at delivering his witty one-liners and comebacks as Charlie. They have great chemistry together, and they make it easy to feel invested with their characters. The supporting cast is also great here, from Lucy Liu and Taye Diggs looking like they are having fun playing the demanding bosses, Meredith Hagner as Zoey's supportive best friend, Tituss Burgess as "Creepy Tim," to many others who were able to make a positive mark on the movie despite their brief minor roles.

"Set It Up," is without a doubt, one of the more charmingly delightful and enjoyably entertaining romantic comedies this year, that you might just find the urge to champion to get other people to watch it. This film is the equivalent of comfort-food, but for movies. So despite it's obvious shortcomings as a completely unique product, it's easy for me to forgive any problems I might have had with it. After all, I did like the movie enough because of it's good qualities, and I can't deny that I love the movie despite it's flawed qualities as well. 

lovedit  ENJOYED IT  likedititsokayitsmehitsterrible 

Watch It On Netflix! 

sicario day of the soldado

Who would have thought that 2015's "Sicario" would end up becoming an Action-Thriller franchise? Yet here we are, with a sequel that somewhat pulls-off justifying it's existence. "Sicario: Day Of The Soldado" mostly retains the nihilistic, dark, cynical, pessimistic, and foreboding tone of the previous installment. I would argue that it's just a little bit less nihilistic, very little bit. Either way, a lot of bad and provocative things happen in this movie, but you should already expect that if you've seen the first one

While Taylor Sheridan wrote the story as he did with the original, it's Directed by Stefano Sollima this time, who makes great use of the camera here. While both script writer and director did a good job with this movie, I felt like they couldn't properly integrate the subplot involving Miguel Hernandez; played by Elijah Rodriguez. Definitely my least favorite parts of the whole thing. The main plot that revolves around the new character of Isabel Reyes; played by Isabela Moner, was a lot better though. Moner was amazing in this, as a teenage girl going through what is probably the worst experience of her life so far. 

People who were fans of the first movie will likely want to go watch this one just to see Josh Brolin and Benicio Del Toro reprise their roles as Matt Graver and Alejandro respectively. For the most part, they are essentially the same characters from the previous movie, with only a minimal amount of character development, to give them at least some growth. I wished they could have done more with the two, but maybe they will in the potential next installment. Sorry to fans of the TV show "Burn Notice," but Jeffrey Donovan as Steve Forsing is once again given a very small supporting role. 

I have to say that while I liked the movie, I'm a little disappointed that "Sicario: Day Of The Soldado" doesn't completely reach that same prestigious level that the first film reached. It definitely has some excellent action sequences though that I thoroughly enjoyed, but it's take on terrorism, illegal immigration, and just the geopolitical stuff, felt much too simplified and arguably insulting even. It's simply a good movie, but it could have been better. With that said, now give me Sicario 3. 

loveditenjoyedit  LIKED IT  itsokayitsmehitsterrible

american animals

It's the Summer movie season of 2018, and you're looking for a good heist film to watch. There are two choices. One is a serious look at how a heist could actually go down in real life, while the other one is an exaggerated take filled with glamorized moments of the crime. Needless to say, "American Animals" is the former, and it is very much a good heist film to watch because of it's realism. 

First and foremost, Writer-Director Bart Layton had an interesting take on making this a pseudo documentary style film, that's mostly dramatization scenes, but mixed with interspersed interviews of the actual individuals involved in the true heist. Just the fact that this movie focuses on the actual people who did the crime, should automatically get a peculiar reaction from movie goers watching it. Is this film inadvertently rewarding them for the horrible act they committed? That's for you to discuss among yourselves. 

As for the story itself, it is undoubtedly fascinating to watch. If it isn't already obvious, this is not a completely straightforward heist film, and doesn't necessarily have all the cliche trappings of the genre. It plays with perspective in interesting ways to make us question what we are watching, and yet it also feels completely honest in what they are showing us on screen. It's not devoid of providing fun humor to the narrative however, but it also doesn't shy away from showing us some very dark and horrible scenes. 

While this heist is an actual true event that you can just Google, I'm still not going to talk about the plot turns and reveals. All I can say is that the story goes places I didn't think it would go, with scenarios you don't normally see in heist movies. The heist itself put me on the edge of my seat, was quite tense to watch, and is without a doubt the main reason to see this film. Well, I have to also say that other reasons to see this are for the amazing performances by Barry Keoghan, Evan Peters, Jared Abrahamson, Blake Jenner, and Ann Dowd. 

There's always been a criticism that many people wrongly romanticize criminal activities, especially when the typical heist films are glamorizing the act of "choreographed" stealing. Usually those movies involves smart and cool criminals going through some elaborate theft that we want to applaud, but thankfully we also have films like "American Animals" that shows us the dumb and foolish criminals that has seen too many Hollywood heist movies. 

lovedit  ENJOYED IT  likedititsokayitsmehitsterrible

wont you be my neighbor

Even if you are not familiar with Fred Rogers, or have never seen "Mister Roger's Neighborhood," I seriously think this film deserves your attention. Even if you don't normally watch documentary films, this movie that chronicles the life of Mr Rogers and the impact he had on society is absolutely worth your time. Even if you don't think this is for you, I urge you to give it a chance, because as hyperbolic as it is for me to say, but I think "Won't You Be My Neighbor" will legitimately be good for you. 

"A movie that's good for you?" You may suspiciously dismiss that claim I just made, but after watching it, I couldn't help but think this is the truth. It isn't just because of how the documentary is nicely directed or edited well to give us a strong narrative, it truly is because of who Mr Rogers was, and what he stood for, and what he meant to many people familiar with him. At one point in the movie, Fred Rogers is described to be "the second Christ," which should give you an idea on what type of person he is to many. 

This documentary does go through Fred Rogers life in a somewhat chronological order, which really does help the narrative feel really palatable enough to watch, especially when compared to the stereotypical "boring" documentaries that people tend to avoid. From archival footage, to interviews with the people who knew him, plus some animated sequences that visualizes some of the themes, this documentary completely had me engaged throughout the whole thing. Add to the fact that it's already quite fascinating to see how impactful Mr Rogers was to society in ways we might not have even noticed, and we got ourselves an amazing documentary to check out. 

While Mr Rogers seems like the kind and enlightened person that everybody should look up, the documentary doesn't shy away from telling us that he was not perfect. He had his personal flaws, and has opinions that many can disagree with. His humanity is what makes Fred such a compelling figure to watch, and also makes him quite relatable. There were things he said and did, that absolutely touched me emotionally, as if he was referring to me directly. How could I not admire this man? 

There are people who have said that they have shed tears watching "Won't You Be My Neighbor" and I understand why. I too found myself in tears during several scenes in this documentary. Your result may vary of course, but you can see how this film moved me. In the world we live in today, still filled with so much strife and animosity toward each other, a person like Mr Rogers and the lessons he teaches are greatly needed, and that can be a powerful emotional realization to have. 

LOVED IT  enjoyeditlikedititsokayitsmehitsterrible

jurassic world fallen kingdom

Remember how people were saying the first "Jurassic World" movie was full of affectionate nostalgic call-backs to "Jurassic Park?" Well, the nostalgia moments are absolutely not gone in this installment! What's perplexing is that "Jurassic World Fallen Kingdom" thinks the previous movie must have come out 20 years ago or something, because somehow it really calls attention to itself whenever they affectionately call-back to specific things about "Jurassic World." A movie that came out 3 years ago! Not all nostalgic call-backs are cool easter eggs people! With that little rant out of the way... 

If you are looking for movie scenes that scream "Jurassic Park," you will get that here. However, the whole movie doesn't completely rely on that throughout it's full run-time, which I can only predict will not make some Jurassic Park fans happy. I suppose I can admire them for trying something different, but the mistake made by writers Derek Connolly and Colin Trevorrow, is that they seem to have given us a story that's predominantly only a set-up for the eventual "Jurassic World 3." This movie by itself doesn't really add anything truly new, that hasn't already been introduced in the previous 4 films. Well there is this one thing, but I won't get into that because spoilers. 

Are you looking to find more character growth with the characters played by Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard here? Keep looking, because you are not going to find that in this movie. Short of some exposition dialogue, both Owen and Claire are essentially the same people from the previous films. They are pretty much just here to continually try and survive dinosaur attacks. The new characters played by Daniella Pineda, Justice Smith, and Isabella Sermon, are decent additions I suppose, but don't really go beyond their archetypal roles. It doesn't help that Justice Smith's character Franklin Webb is kinda cringe worthy. 

So what's the point of watching this movie? Director J.A. Bayona. There were some legitimately brilliantly shot moments in this movie that almost justifies the ticket price of seeing this on the big screen. One or two of those moments are probably seared into my brain at how effective they were in getting an emotional reaction out of me. A few other moments were just simply and absolutely perfect for monster movies. Unfortunately the movie has to go out of it's way to create some very embarrassingly contrived eye-rolling convoluted plot turns just to get to those specific great moments. I'm talking plot conveniences, scenes that break my suspension of disbelief, or simply just some really stupid things that happens. 

Seriously though, a lot of stupid things happen in this movie. A lot. I just wanted to shout at the screen, "What was the point of all that?!" or "How does that even make sense?!" Sometimes I would want to also yell at the characters and ask "okay now what? You're just going to go do that, and then just ignore it? Where's the appropriate follow through to your actions?! Is there a deleted scene that I'm not seeing here or something?!" Imagine me also saying all that to the writers. Sure enough, the movie was kinda frustrating to watch multiple times over. 

With all that said. There are two words that perfectly describes "Jurassic World Fallen Kingdom." Underwhelming, and Dinosaurs. To no one's surprise, the dinosaurs are the best things about this movie. Someone however can argue that the dinosaur shtick is kinda getting too repetitive. Another person might also argue that it already was repetitive in the previous film. 

loveditenjoyeditlikedit  IT'S OKAY  itmehitssterrible 

hearts beat loud

Those of you who already know my tastes in movies, know that I'm a sucker for films about people creating songs and music and the whole "let's start a band" premise. "Hearts Beat Loud" definitely fits that description, and sure enough, I enjoyed the heck out of it. Similar to many modern-style musicals like "Once" or "Band Aid," it also features original songs here, and I'm happy to say that I liked all the songs. In fact, I wish there were more songs. After watching the movie, I did immediately go listen to the whole original movie soundtrack, and I should also mention that the songs were written by Keegan Dewitt. 

Admittedly, since the premise is similar to many of the other modern-style musicals, there can be a derivative feeling to the plot progression. Some would say that it panders a bit, by revisiting some very tried and true plot points that are suppose to generate a specific reaction, as they have done in other movies. The themes involving loving music, or living life, etc, are also similar to those other films, and it's true that some insightful lines of wisdom may seem too precious. I get that some people might consider all that a negative, but as someone who loves these kinds of films, I didn't care. I was all in, and loved giving the movie the exact kind of reactions it wanted from me. 

If you needed more reasons to see this movie, besides the premise, and the songs, then it's the cast. Nick Offerman is fantastic in the role, as somebody who seems to have arrested development, being stuck in a mindset from when he was a young man in a band. On the flip side, Kiersey Clemons is amazing in her role as the daughter, who is actually "the adult" in the family, that's genuinely looking forward to go to college. The thing is that both of them are musically talented, and the scenes where they create or perform songs, are exactly the kinds of scenes that I really dig. Both actors did in fact perform their songs themselves too, which is always appreciated. The supporting cast are also great in this, like Toni Collette, Ted Danson, and Sasha Lane. Each adding their own significant marks to the overall story and themes. Red Hook, New York, in many ways is also a character in this movie, and makes me want to visit that place after seeing this. 

I'd like to mention that I saw "Hearts Beat Loud" on Father's Day, and coincidentally enough, I would easily argue that this is one of the best movies to watch on that day. That Father and Daughter relationship featured here is the heart of this story, and it absolutely engaged me. Writer-Director Brett Haley gave me a small and simple movie that more people need to give a chance, and I for sure will gladly champion it. 

lovedit  ENJOYED IT  likedititsokayitsmehitsterrible